ULTIMATE REALITY AND THE MEANINGFUL LIFE – HEGEL (final continuation)

HISTORY

For me the most intriguing part of Hegel’s philosophy of ultimate reality is his integration of human history with his first three components – Geist, Idea, and Nature – creating a then unprecedented intersection of philosophy and history. Briefly the logical power of Spirit or Mind – the Idea – enters and guides mortal men in historical events and learning. “All dialectical thought-paths lead to the Absolute Idea and to a knowledge of it which is itself.”8 As such, the Begriffe, or universal notional shapes are evinced in the facts of history and the ways in which they align themselves leading one to the next, ultimately means they are distinguishable facets of a single all-inclusive universal.9 That is “what must be conceived as realizing itself in what is individual and empirical, and as responsible both for the being and intelligibility of the latter.”10

In brief then, human history is the ‘self-development’ of Spirit, the actualization of the divine Idea or  cosmic plan.11 When the historical process ends, Spirit will have fully realized itself within a state of ‘global reason’ of all of mankind – at which point, “historical and spiritual greatness will coincide.”12,13 Moreover this actualization will extend beyond the terrestrial globe.14 In that history, Hegel believes is the progress of consciousness of freedom.15 Thus the goal for us as participants in history is to create a fully rational organization of the world and a truly free community where duty and self-interest harmonize.

SUMMARY

One is awed if not completely convinced by Hegel’s thinking. Spirit and Idea defy ontological speculation, but do in fact seem to fit our experience of the world and of our history as directional even if imperfectly so. While the things in the world may have independent existence, their nature and classification and the laws that govern them are only revealed conceptually in the minds of rational creatures. It is tantalizing to think of human minds as portions of or sharing in a larger mental entity. The hope that the progress and rationality manifest in the universe is recognized and advanced in the history of humanity is at a minimum a reason for optimism. Hegel, it seems, asks all of us to participate in ultimate reality via thoughtful involvement in human history through politics, science, and culture. If he is right, no more tangible relationship to ultimate reality is possible.

————————————————————

8Miller, A.V. (translator), Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1977. ISBN 978-0-19-824697-1, page vii .

9Ibid.

10Ibid, page viii

11There are some less becoming components of Hegel’s theory, such as the state as the culmination of world history and the great man (Napoleon in his lifetime) as mastering the world. His philosophy is later modified by Karl Marx into communism and by less virtuous individuals to justify tyrannical regimes.

12Hartman, Robert S. (editor), The Liberal Arts edition of Hegel, G.W.F., Reason in History. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 1953. Page xiv.

13Hegel goes even further, possibly too far, by identifying his book, Phenomenology of Spirit, as the very path that was taken by Spirit in past history and then “rehearsed in the consciousness of Hegel, in whom the notion of Science first became actual.” (Miller, A.V. (translator), Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1977. ISBN 978-0-19-824697-1, page vi)

14Hartman, Robert S. (editor), The Liberal Arts edition of Hegel, G.W.F., Reason in History. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 1953. Page xv.

15Honderich, Ted, The Oxford Guide to Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2005. ISBN 978-0-19-534093-8 pages 367.

ULTIMATE REALITY AND THE MEANINGFUL LIFE – G.W.F. HEGEL (continued)

IDEA

For Hegel the Idea is very tightly related to Geist, and I suspect some scholars might argue they are identical, but I understand the Idea as emanating from Geist as the abstract thought or logical power of the divine that enters and guides mortal beings. The Idea is absolute, and thus “remains untouched by the human passions which actualize it.”3 Idea includes the laws of logic coming from the divine mind that constitutes Reason. And the greatest principle of divine logic is that thoughts and events encounter counter-positions and events that resolve into new paradigms or situations wherein the process begins again; hence the unending cycle of thesis – antithesis – synthesis.

Idea develops in space and time; in space as Nature and in time as Spirit or universal history. The universal progression is logical and systematic or in Hegel’s words, ‘scientific history.’ The absolute Idea is fulfilled when historical and spiritual greatness coincide. Here we come upon one of Hegel’s great thoughts; since the rational comes from the divine, “all that is real is rational and all that is rational is real.”4

NATURE

Nature, or perhaps more accurately, the physical world, is the third manifestation of Hegel’s ultimate reality. Like Kant, Hegel believes things which we perceive are real, but unlike Kant he feels there is no undisclosed “thing-in-itself.” In fact Hegel takes a nearly opposite position that things are realized through our conceptions of them. In perceiving things of the world, we uncover the universals. For instance, for a tree in front of me it is Here and Now, but as I turn away, what I perceive changes but the Here and Now still apply to the next perception. Here and Now then are in Hegel’s thinking universals. Other universals include pure being, the ‘I,’ meaning, Truth, and the ‘Also’ (referring to the multiple facets manifest in a thing such as color or shape).5

For Hegel, Nature consists of forces interacting according to laws. The knowledge of these laws is a kind of self-knowledge since in penetrating the forces behind phenomena we become aware of what we devised and put there. Meanwhile, ‘thinghood’ and pure essence, are nothing else but what Here and Now have proved themselves to be, “a simple togetherness of a plurality.”6 Through these recognitions, the finite human mind progresses to see the world as part of itself.7

(final continuation next post)

————————————————————

3Hartman, Robert S. (editor), The Liberal Arts edition of Hegel, G.W.F., Reason in History. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 1953. Page ix.

4Ibid., page xvi.

5Miller, A.V. (translator), Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1977. ISBN 978-0-19-824697-1, pages 58-66 (sections 90-110).

6Ibid.,page 68 (section 113).

ULTIMATE REALITY AND THE MEANINGFUL LIFE – G.W.F. HEGEL

“Within the purposes of the Cosmos, and vivifying all meteorology, and all the congeries of the mineral, the vegetable, and animal worlds – all the physical growth and development of man, and all the history of the race of politics, religions, wars, etc., there is a moral purpose, a visible or invisible intention, certainly underlying all … That something is the All, and the idea of All, with the accompanying idea of eternity, and of itself, the soul, buoyant, indestructible, sailing space forever.” – Walt Whitman1

In the last several posts we saw that for Kant, ultimate reality is the transcendental or noumenal realm revealed as reason, the thing-in-itself, God as implicit in reason and the moral law, and absolute good will. All are at least partly accessible to humans although to different degrees. Unquestionably one of the greatest followers on Kantian philosophy was Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831) who was influenced by Kant, but rejected much of his thought. Hegel rejects the idea of a noumenal reality, and replaces Kant’s facets of the transcendental with four interlocking principles of his own: (1) Geist, or Mind (sometimes translated consciousness or Spirit), (2) Idea (perhaps also Logic), (3) Nature, i.e. the universe, and (4) History – specifically human history. Perhaps the most instrumental component of his system is his formulation of a final dialectic:  thesis –> antithesis –> synthesis. But most compelling for us is the pivotal place of humanity in the self-revelation of the divine mind. Let’s examine his metaphysics in more detail.

GEIST

In Phenomenology of Mind, his first major work published in 1807, Hegel develops his central theory of Geist, sometimes translated as Spirit, but more often and presumably more accurately as Mind. Some authorities believe Hegel chose the word Geist specifically because of its ambiguous or dual meaning – connoting both a spiritual being and an absolute intelligence.

For Hegel, Geist is the intelligent and spiritual underpinning of the universe, a kind of divine entity that set in motion the universe following a preconceived but gradually developing plan. He seems to avoid the question of whether there is an ontological basis for Geist, but agues it can be deduced from its apparent penetration of all of reality. He characterizes Geist as the unity underlying the distinct sides of all facets of the world – that which integrates everything into a rational totality. Geist expresses three modalities; universality, specificity, and singularity. It is a consciousness, a subjectivity, a self-active universal in specific form confronting its subjectivity and thereby achieving self.

Hegel also calls Geist the Thinking Ego connected with the categories used in the synthetic constitution of objects by the understanding. It is the equivalent of the form of self. But it is not a personal thinker rather the “logical function of universality” and the place of forms. It has an implicit existence in natural objects as a sort of being beneath the surface of natural objects as the essences or forces which explain them.2

(continued next post)

————————————————————

1From Democratic Vistas. Quoted by Hartman, Robert S. in his introduction to The Library of Liberal Arts edition of Hegel, G.W.F., Reason in History. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, 1953. Page xv.

2Miller, A.V. (translator), Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1977. ISBN 978-0-19-824697-1, pages x-xi. Also see Phenomenology Sections 18, 152, 235, and 803 for particular descriptions. (Hegel’s systematic approach is very evident in his use of numbered passages to compartmentalize his thinking.)